Those of us of a certain age – and we know who we are – look
at some of our habits and start wondering what little changes we could make in
our diets that might pay dividends by extending our lives. Perhaps one less glass of wine here or a
little less red meat there. Maybe just a
latte instead of a venti mocha chocolate sauce-a-chino at Starbucks. How about a walk after dinner, dear?
These are all reasonable things to contemplate. Unless, of course, you’re a group of middle-aged
scientists. In which case, trying to buy
yourself a few years starts with starving monkeys.
I am not making this up.
The New York Times reports that scientists have been
starving rhesus monkeys (OK, the words in the story are “severely restricted
diets”) for their own good. The theory
is that when you reach old age you should starve yourself to extend your
life. I suppose the idea is that the
body’s survival mechanisms kick in because, well, you’re starving.
No word on whether this is actually a psychological
experiment to see if those later years just seem longer.
In many ways, ideas like this are nothing new. Ancient Greek physicians had a highly
developed regimen of who should eat what and saw no distinction between menus
and medicine. Generations later in
Western culture, fat people were thought to be healthy and in many ways they
were since their health was measured against the starving serfs and beggars in
the streets who did not have a very long, happy life.
The link between food and medicine is now part of our
popular culture. Mass-produced foods are
marketed as medicine. Apparently, if you
eat Cheerios you don’t die. I saw it on
TV just the other day.
But, let’s stop monkeying around and get back to that
experiment.
When the monkeys get old, we’ll starve them to see if that
extends their lives. This was more than
just a hypothesis to some scientists.
According to the Times, some of the scientists believe in this
starvation life extension so enthusiastically that they have “severely restricted”
their own diets. The idea was
intoxicating (or perhaps it was just delirium from not eating) since several
studies on rats and other animals indicated a positive link.
So, these scientists were starving themselves and anyone who
depended on them for food without bothering to note that some other, better
fed, scientists were looking at those seminal studies and suggesting that the
science was flawed. Apparently the original
researchers discounted any lab rat deaths from a cause not directly
attributable to old age (you know, like malnutrition from not getting enough to
eat).
The results from this latest round of starvation studies? These skinny old monkeys did not live any
longer than monkeys who ate a regular diet.
However, they were three times as likely to yell things like, “You kids
get off of my lawn!”
CD, you always have one line that cracks me up totally. The line about seeing it on TV did it this time.
ReplyDeleteI'd starve myself, if I could, to extend my life and get more done. But honestly, not eating makes me really crabby.
Mimi